Are women better rulers than men?

This argu workforcet on the question; are women better regulations than men? Will focus on the example of Elizabeth I compared to the medium of male rulers.

It mostly depends which era you live in, in modern font times it would really not make much of a difference as both genders are considered equal. But in the Tudor era, looking at it from the present, a female would definitely rescue had the upper hand, but from the common perspective of nation in the Tudor times a female would have been considered lower, for a number of reasons, the main one being, female rulers were supposed to have a husband to make the decisions for them, while the tabby cat got on producing a male heir. Because it was lady-like in those times. The definition for lady-like consequently was to be quiet, sit in a corner be submissive to males and not be able to do any(prenominal) thing for themselves. That really did challenge Elizabeth in the start as her parliament kept pestering her toThere were a number of traits that Elizabeth excessively had that made her more successful than others. One of them was she was fluent in 6 languages; her native English, French, Italian, Spanish, Greek, and Latin. Later she came to terms with a sting of german.



They became very useful to her in foreign plolitical situations such as when shemade an bond certificate with France. The St Bartholomews Day Massacre, in which thousands of French Protestants (Huguenots) were killed, strained the alliance but did not break it. Elizabeth even began marriage negotiations with Henry, Duke of Anjou , and later with his younger brother François, Duke of Anjou and Alençon.

Another was that she was a just ruler and upheld the law, when she wanted, she could be ruthless (such as...

If you want to get a copious essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper