How globalized world issues could be helped? Essay

The people want to topple the regime was the anti-government graffiti varicolored by a group of Syrian children in the Daraa city in March 2011. These children were arrested and tortured by the local anaesthetic security authorities (Diehl, 2012 7). This proceeding eventu tout ensembley led to an anti-governmental uprising collect to the outrageous reaction of a community over childrens mistreatment after incarceration by the local security authorities. The uprising demanded the release of children, justice, freedom as well as equality for all people. At the core, these peaceful demonstrations were considered to be against the sectarian and family monocracy because the political indicator was mainly held by the Alawite elite (Diehl, 2012). In reception to these demonstrations, the Syrian government planned to enforce security forces for the protestors to suppress them. This gave stick out to the tensions dramatic colleague and tensions spread in the entire country. This reb ellion further sour into a full-fledged civil war amongst the Free Syrian army and the Syrian regime (Thompson, 2016). The main allegation that the Syrian regime associated with the protestors was that they were Islamic Al- Qaedas extremist terrorist gangs who were support and funded by the miscellaneous countries much(prenominal) as dud, Qatar, the kingdom of Saudi Arabia as well as the United States of America by which they try to seek peace with Israel (Sommier, 2014). Similarly, the said(prenominal) Syrian regime was present in the front line with Israel who was supported by Russia, Iran as well as China (?) (Fisher, 2012). Ever since this happened, the daub and complexity of the war has been deepened with different actors entering from the global, regional or Syrian side and due to which Syria was turned into a proxy battlefield (Wimmen and Asseburg, 2012)The wipeout toll as recorded and presented by the Syrian center for insurance seek approximately totaled at 470,0 00 as a prove of ongoing conflict till February 2016. Due to the intensification and spread of fighting, a appalling humanitarian crisis was evident since 4.8 million people tried to take institution abroad and 6.1 million people were internally displaced as per the records of UN Office for the Coordination of humanist Affairs. It has too been reported by the Syrian Ne twork for Human Rights that since 2011, more(prenominal) than 117,000 people have been either disappe atomic number 18d or detained by the governmental forces. In the detention, ill-treatment and torture atomic number 18 two rampant things that have also resulted in the death of thousands of people in detention. In addition to all the crisis events going on, ISIS (Islamic State) made more complications by the widespread and arrangementatic violations. This was achieved by ISIS through targeting civilians with artillery, kidnappings, executions, using children as soldiers, and torture (Human Rights Watch, 2016) .One of the biggest challenges that the global relations could face was about how globalized world issues (?) could be helped. With the help of deep research and fascinating drawing of the international relations, the concept has been explored in the book of foreign Relations Theories (Where is with the name of the book) by Steve Smith (Smith, Kurki and Dunne, 2016 11) Why you delete the victor articulatement here?. Based on this, there atomic number 18 various currents that toilet be evident in the international relations theories with a particular focus on the Syrian conflict. Constructivism and realism are two entirely different things are they take up different approaches.Compared to a normative approach, realism takes up an explanatory approach for the study of international relations. Realism is based on the following 3 core competencies1. States are owned by egoism and self- interests and are the unitary and rational actors2. States are considered to be the central a ctors of international arena WHY you delete statism? (Dunne and Schmidt, 2017 109)3. insurrection is visible in the international system (Ikenberry and Parsi, 2009)Anarchy can be described as a system that comprises of various independent states who do non have either particular authority over them (Mearsheimer, 2001 30). This at long last guarantees survival as well as security through square capabilities and self- help (Waltz, 1979 213)A pessimistic outlook of persistent danger and scourge is possessed by the realists, based on which it mentioned that all the state actors are driven by the requirement of greater originator and dominance for reduce the elimination of actors potential and create a symmetry of provide (Gellman, 1988). Within an anarchic system, the type of contestation and insecurity inherent, such type of concentrations automatically adapt to the balancing responses by either by internal balancing where material capabilities are made up or through externa l balancing where capabilities are aggregated. This provides evidence that alliances are not so much appreciated in terms of realism and dual-lane ideas and values, however, it does through raison detat and self- interests (Morgenthau, 1948).In realism, it should be noted that the states are not equal and are placed in a hierarchical read as per the amount of power they have. In an anarchical system, the simply trend to defend and survive is to use the military power (Slaughter, 2011). Some of the self-centered passions are given primary emphasis by the realists, especially that the front end of political action with an evil in it as mentioned by Donnelly in 2000 (Morgenthau, 1946 203). Due to this condition, politics turn into such a struggle where the keister of war WHERE IS is something that is considered to be ever- present (Aron, 1970 36) mainly due to the irreconcilable aspirations of the states (Carr, 1946). check to this, every state would try to obtain as much power as possible. But in case there is an im proportionateness of power, the samelihood of war becomes high primarily because the stronger state may attack the weaker state without any loss to itself. This idea about power not only encompasses around the military power, rather it also encompasses around the economic power. This meat that states whose economies are growing help the states to gain more power this is because power in the international system is demonstrated through economic strength. Therefore, the concern of realists is foc utilise on economy of a state as it is link to its power (Mearsheimer, 2016).As per the realists, who consider that non- governmental organizations lack military power, they are not able to compete with the international systems. This means that the role play by United Nations is limited (Dunne and Schmidt, 2017 106). This is deemed important because the main actors in international relations are worried about gaining higher benefits than the others have gained.Strategies like mutual mistrust, selfishness, power- seeking, recklessness, as well as survival securing, are considered to be capable for producing structures like security dilemmas, international self- help systems, political communities, unexclusive politics of national interests, the permanent potentiality of war and violence and many an(prenominal) others.The above discussed theoretical formulation of realism can also be applied to the conflict of Syria being studied in this paper. This conflict of Syria can be regarded as a struggle of gaining power among foreign actors or states who contrasted in their interests scarce were involved in the conflict. For example, Russia, China, United States of America, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and others who approached Syrian war, all of them had their personal benefits as well as predicted results in mind to achieve.The power of United States of America in the international system was tried to be restricted by the support of al- Assad government by China, Russia, and Iran with the militia- cum- party of Hezbollah. This was achieved through the formation of an alliance with Syria as well as vetoing interference by United Nations Security Council. This helped them to restrict the US from gaining any anatomy of advantage over North Africa or Middle eastern United States (Yan, 2013).Ever since the conflict started in Syria, Assad was supported by Russia by all means including in terms of weapons, technical advisors as well as by sending military advisors. Eventually, in 2015, September 15, a right off military intervention was opted by Russia despite the fact that it aimed to fight ISIS but it was mainly meant to target opponents of Assad (Spaulding, 2015). Since the cold war ended, Russias identity as one of the world powers has greatly reduced and as per the framework of zero-sum competition for power provided by Dunne and Schmidt (Dunne and Schmidt, 2017 110), the only way out for Russia is to avoid cle ar exclusion from the area while balancing Washingtons stir as well. Moscows projection of power in the easterly Mediterranean was also dependent upon the survival of Assad so that the power could be specifically projected to geopolitical ambitions and interests of Russia (Litsas, 2017). This further poses a big query about whether Russia can be sure about its position and recourse of its economic interests or not (Freedman, 2010).On the other hand and on an equal basis, there was a breeze of uneasiness in between American government and Iran because the American government was able to make an mold in the region and in return was upsetting the regional power as mentioned in Sick et al. (2008 1) WHY you change the reference and grade the name of the writer out WHERE IS the original statement (it is clear that Iran is now a centerpiece of American Policy (Sick et al., 2008 1) that Iran was the centerpiece of attraction for the American policy. Due to this, Iranians took greater d efensive measures as they continued to internally balance and build their nuclear capabilities. Considering the military standing between Syria and Iran that is only meant to procure the borders and state to balance the potential threats that may arise from Turkey, Israel, American ally of the Sunni Gulf States and others (Laub, 2017). Iran is still considered to have a stronger strategic position due to the fact that Syria would be at their hands with the loyalty of Hezbollah in Lebanon and Palestine at one site. This is also one of the justifications that have been used by Iran to support its involvement in ideological motive because Allah has consistent all Muslims to defend and protect each other from all sort of outside threats, as per Imam Khomeini. This is another reason with which Iran supports its view of defend and supporting Palestinians because they are not recognized by the West and are repressed by Israel (Segall, 2012).