Imperialism can be and is a very strong neb of the trade. But also can be a implement that can back fire at any scrap in the users face. With the right leader in position I believe that imperialism is a good thing except entirely to a certain point.
If imperialism is used to move toward globalization I believe that it is an scoreense but if it used to play the fictitious character of a police man it can be justified. Britain for exemplification used it to increase their personal welfare, an excellent strategy on their part but not for others exspeci whollyy those in Africa. Although if they wouldnt keep up had as much competetion with country such as France and other European countrys may form slowy moved toward globilization and today they just aptitude have been in control of 3/4 of the world. other reason too much territory control is a negitve is because it makes it hard for the leader of the dominate country to control all of their land and the people living in that land. Because of this difficulty countrys have been know to resort to abuse and unfair treatment of the fresh aquired lands inhabitants, just as Britain did with India. They did this just to intimidate the poeple and keep them downstairs their control.
A great use of imperialism I think is using it to association up influental areas to increase trade. I believe we should have followed on with the actions of Britain when they set up a sphere of influence in China. Other good use is use it to police and to protect your own boarders. For example Hawyi. Hawyi was an excellent imperialistic move on the United states part. It set up a great position and harbors for protection of the western coast.
--
References
-->There are some spelling and grammar mistakes, but more(prenominal) importantly, I think you need to be more factual, and support your assertions with facts, even if you are presenting your personal opinion.
You make the program line If imperialism is used to move toward globalization I believe that it is an evil but you dont elaborate on the link between globalisation and imperialism any further, which makes me pose the question: could the process of globalisation have occurred without the existence of imperialism?
This essay would make alot more sense if you started off with a clear definition of imperialism - it seems that you are discussing imperialism as a political ideology, not as an economic/political neighborly system.
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment