The fourth crusade: a plot?

Was there a plot to divert the quaternate iron out to Constantinople, and if so who was responsible?

We give never k right away, and science has genuinely fewthing better to do than to discuss indefinitely an insoluble conundrum -P. Mitrofanov

This famous comment on the fourth crusade and the unbelief of a plot was made well over a century ago, and very little new evidence has emerged since. So why return to this topic?

Most modern historians are of the impression that the diversion of the Fourth Crusade to Constantinople was non the result of a plot. Queller, for example, writes By reflection upon a detailed examination of the Fourth Crusade... we can perhaps expand our understanding of mankind caught up in the great current of events , and Riley-Smith, Mayer and Pernoud are all of more or less the same opinion. Indeed it cannot be proved, now or probably ever, that the diversion of the crusade was the result of a plot; but the mere lack of proof should not lead to a conclusion that there was no plot. It is not the duty of historians to treat subjects as innocent until proven finable and there is no justification in rash, unproven conclusions much(prenominal) as that quoted above.



This essay will draw attention to the notable degree of conspiracy and intrigue surrounding the crusade and the doubtful morals of some of its protagonists. It will also review some of the most valid of the arguments previously put forward in support of one or other of the plot theories. It will argue that, although it cannot be proved, there is a fair chance that the leaders of the crusade were guilty of plotting to divert the crusade, and that this possibility should sure as shooting not be lightly dismissed.

Most writers who have argued...

If you want to crap a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper